On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 11:40:17PM +0100, Flavio Stanchina wrote:
> I'm a bit skeptical about this. While it's certainly very unusual
> for a Debian mirror to be missing a file which should actually be
> there, accidents can happen. If I was in charge, I think I wouldn't
> try to cache misses, or at least would have a separate, very short
> timeout (on the order of minutes) for them.
The caching was added to address this bug report:
http://bugs.debian.org/625458
and it apparently makes a big difference. But I'll think about using
a different, much shorter timeout by default.
Cheers,
Eric
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
