On 15.01.2012 08:47, Arthur de Jong wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Any chance you could consider an upload with *just* the above change
(and a changelog entry), and without the version change noise in the
rest of your diff?
I could do this but the other two functional changes, although not
affecting many users, are bugs with simple and clear fixes. The range
checking patch is a little bigger though.
Is there any reason the other changes are inappropriate?
I assume Julien had missed your follow-up with the other patches and
the "just" was in reference to the upstream changes. icbw though, of
course.
I could upload a 0.7.15+squeeze1 package with just the one change
(#645599, no version bumps) if you like but 0.7.16 would be easier
for
me to track versions. I'm planning on switching to non-native
packaging
to make these things simpler in the future.
If the two further changes included in the debdiff from
<1324994307.2556.15.ca...@sorbet.thuis.net> are resovled in unstable (if
appropriate) then I'd be happy to look at including those in a stable
update. I have to admit that, like Julien, I would prefer an update
that only includes the changes relevant to the bug fixes; I appreciate
this means a little more maintenance burden when you're dealing with a
native package.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org