On mån, 2012-01-16 at 12:15 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I don't think 'service' should deviate from 'invoke-rc.d' in that
> case.

I think the way to think about this is that 'service' is one layer below
'invoke-rc.d'.  invoke-rc.d could be implemented by calling 'service'
internally after checking the policy.




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to