tags 656189 pending thanks On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:58 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 à 08:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : > > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > Source: petsc > > > > Severity: important > > > > Tags: patch > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > It would be nice if you could apply the attached patch. > > > > It disables the search of mpicc as hcp. > > > > For an unclear reason, it fixes the bug #624671. > > > > slepc fails to build under sparc if hcp is used (while mpiCC will work). > > > > > > I don't understand, slepc 3.2 built just fine on sparc (so I closed > > > 624671). Is there a spurious package which provides a binary 'hcp' > > > which perhaps PETSc should Build-Conflict with? > > > > Okay, just checked and found hcp in lam4-dev, should have expected it > > there. This is now an obsolete problem because mpi-default-dev uses > > mpich2 on non-openmpi architectures. > > > > Since LAM is deprecated and end-of-life in Debian, can I close this bug > > by adding lam4-dev to PETSc's Build-Conflicts? People will still be > > able to build using LAM by doing "debian/rules binary", as described in > > README.Debian . > ok, fine with me. > > Thanks for digging
Thanks, just committed this fix to alioth, will upload when there's a critical mass of new changes. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
