On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 09:43:22PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Am I right in understanding that it only affects armhf and not > armel, because armel isn't build with thumb? I assume that's why > people running Ubuntu claim that "-marm" fixes it? > > I have an armel box, but I can't reproduce it and it can't run > armhf, but does support thumb.
So the patched version generates the same file for me on armhf as I get on armel. But it's different than what I get on i386/amd64. But that's probably just rounding errors. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
