[Nicolas Bonifas] > svn-bisect doesn't behave as expected if good_rev > bad_rev (a > subsequent "svn-bisect bad" command will select the wrong half of the > suspucious revisions).
Indeed. When I (re-)wrote it I assumed the only interesting case was to detect a regression (good < bad). But 'good' and 'bad' are mere labels and sometimes perhaps it is more convenient to label the older rev as the 'good' one. I'll fix it. Thanks for the report. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
