Hi!

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:47:39AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Suggesting Paul to cherry-pick this or that isolated patch was not
> sufficient. Therefore, as an attempt to clear any confusion and allow
> me to report clear facts to the rsync handler upstream author (rhatto,
> Cc'd):
> 
> Paul, could you please try running the rsync handler from upstream Git
> (at commit 8a794ac) on top of your backupninja 0.9.10-1 installation?

I did that.  So, I had a backup run at 25/1 at 1:00, then I replaced the
rsync handler and ran it at 10:09.  Tonight, at 3:00 backupninja ran
and this is the resulting metadata:

# for x in */*; do echo -n "$x: "; head -1 $x; done
daily.1/created: Thu 26 Jan 2012 03:17:29 CET
daily.2/created: Wed 25 Jan 2012 01:08:24 CET
daily.2/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
daily.3/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
daily.4/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
daily.5/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
daily.6/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
daily.7/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET
weekly.2/rotated: Thu 26 Jan 2012 03:13:19 CET

So far, it seems fine?...  I'll let it run for a few days and report in
next week.

Thanks!
Paul

-- 
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux  | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net          | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to