Hi! On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 01:47:39AM +0100, intrigeri wrote: > Suggesting Paul to cherry-pick this or that isolated patch was not > sufficient. Therefore, as an attempt to clear any confusion and allow > me to report clear facts to the rsync handler upstream author (rhatto, > Cc'd): > > Paul, could you please try running the rsync handler from upstream Git > (at commit 8a794ac) on top of your backupninja 0.9.10-1 installation?
I did that. So, I had a backup run at 25/1 at 1:00, then I replaced the rsync handler and ran it at 10:09. Tonight, at 3:00 backupninja ran and this is the resulting metadata: # for x in */*; do echo -n "$x: "; head -1 $x; done daily.1/created: Thu 26 Jan 2012 03:17:29 CET daily.2/created: Wed 25 Jan 2012 01:08:24 CET daily.2/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET daily.3/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET daily.4/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET daily.5/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET daily.6/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET daily.7/rotated: Wed 25 Jan 2012 10:09:13 CET weekly.2/rotated: Thu 26 Jan 2012 03:13:19 CET So far, it seems fine?... I'll let it run for a few days and report in next week. Thanks! Paul -- Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org