On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:45:01PM +0200, David Mart?nez Moreno wrote: > El Domingo, 25 de Septiembre de 2005 23:12, Drew Scott Daniels escribi?: [...] > > I'm cc'ing the developers of peep. For the history of this bug see: > > http://bugs.debian.org/93208 > > > > I'd still be interested in seeing a Debian package of peep, the "Network > > Auralizer". Javi, I don't understand what you mean by "for > > log-interpretation I do prefer log-analys/logcheck". Can these be made > > to output sounds? > > > > If anyone knows of a better "auralizer" that I could use for network/log > > events, please let me know. I'd be happy to find a less complicated > > alternative to peep (and thus have reason to re-close the request for > > package bug 93208). > > > > Upstream development is stalled. The developers are responsive, but it > > seems they don't have time to do many new developments [1]. I believe > > they can be convinced to help out with licensing or compilation problems. > > > > [1] > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8273164&forum_id=4626 > > In fact, http://www.auralizer.com seems, like any other time I checked > since > two years ago or so, down with a Connection timed out. > Yes, I've noticed that too, but the sourceforge project is still active (although the "homesite" points to auralizer.com). Google's cache allows people to access some of the subpages on http://peep.sourceforge.net
Also, SourceForge seems to bounce my e-mail so I hope it picked up yours. Drew Daniels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]