Hello, On Sun, February 5, 2012 8:29 pm, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Why another .ini file library is needed, while about 1000 others > are already available?
I have submitted an ITP for rudecgi parser lib for C++ and uploaded the package to mentors(#658347). After that found all the components of http://rudeserver.com to be interesting. So, wanted to package all of them and started with the .ini file lib. If it is unnecessary re-work I would stop working on it and close the bug. I would also request an opinion whether the core libs at http://rudeserver.com are worth packaging. I want to submit ITPs for all of them. Else I would stop doing the same. Sincerely, -- Medhamsh Hacktivist | http://medhamsh.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
