Joachim Breitner, le Mon 13 Feb 2012 19:35:28 +0000, a écrit : > Am Montag, den 13.02.2012, 20:16 +0100 schrieb Samuel Thibault: > > Samuel Thibault, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:55:34 +0100, a écrit : > > > Joachim Breitner, le Sat 11 Feb 2012 23:36:44 +0100, a écrit : > > > > thanks. Is the patch tested, i.e. can I blindly apply and forward it to > > > > upstream? > > > > > > I'm doing it. > > > > Btw, it's confirmed. > > Thanks. I’ll forward it to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ as well, > unless you want to do it yourself (and get the ticket comment mails).
Please do. > > > > Also, could you do a porter upload for hurd with the change for now; > > > > > > Ok, I'll do the build towards a debian-ports upload then. I understand > > > the difficulties of managing a transition that affects almost 5% > > > packages :) > > > > AIUI, I'll however have to rebuild all the packages that have been built > > so far, knowing that they'll again be built with the next unstable > > upload :) > > Not necessarily. Your upload is built using 7.4.1. When I upload > 7.4.1-1, it will be built with your upload, which is a 7.4.1 as well, so > most likely and hopefully, the hashes will be the same and no rebuilds > will be necessary. What are the hashes based on exactly? My rebuild with the ELF patch got other hashes for libghc-base-dev-4.5.0.0-78eb0 libghc-cabal-dev-1.14.0-b87dd libghc-directory-dev-1.1.0.2-e6870 libghc-ghc-dev-7.4.1-59359 libghc-template-haskell-dev-2.7.0.0-f6fb4 libghc-unix-dev-2.5.1.0-d60c1 AIUI, "base" means that about all packages need to be rebuilt :/ Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
