Lars Bahner wrote:
>Package: bacula-fd
>Version: 1.36.2-2sarge1
>Severity: important
>
>
>Firstly building with debian/rules build and then afterwards changing to
>rescue/linux/cdrom and running make all (as root), runs a bit and then
>spews out:
>
>
Well, i don't package it. Sorry, but that means that i cannot possibly
support it.
>cp: cannot stat `../../../../src/filed/static-bacula-fd': No such file
>or directory
>make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
>make[1]: Leaving directory
>`/home/bahner/src/bacula-1.36.2/rescue/linux/cdrom/bacula'
>make: *** [bacula] Error 2
>
>
Needs a completely different "./configure" command line altogether...
the build process is complicated enough as it is right now. I can't
possibly have the time to support yet more packages right now with the
DB transition just ahead. Maybe later...
>This should work, because disaster recovery is an important feature of
>bacula. Even better of cource, would be to have a bacula-dr package
>which builds cleanly and lightly, but I suppose this is not easy - or
>even possible - considering the requirements for building a rescue
>CD-image.
>
>
Correct. But then, the proper way would have been to file a WISHLIST bug.
That having the disaster recovery part of Bacula packaged in Debian does
not mean that it is indeed severity important. Hence, i am downgrading
it immediately.
Point taken, however, and i will try to see how can it be done.
Regards,
J.L.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
