Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:23:16AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > > Attached are the patches that Joey (Schulze) approved.
> >
> > Can you (or Joey) comment: did you use a different patch because you
> > believe mine to be insecure, or for a different reason? (That's an
> > important question, since as you know, my patch was uploaded to unstable
> > and will presumably be in the next stable release.)
>
> Your patch looks good.
>
> The reason that I used the one I did was because it was created
> a few weeks ago when there was no other patch publically
> available. Had I seen yours at the time I would have used it
> instead, rather than going with something different.
>
> I certainly don't think you need do anything drastic like
> use the one I made in another upload. Although it was a
> fair question to ask.
Probably the same reason by me. An advisory is pending, the packages
are being built already - the X advisory didn't exactly help...
Regards,
Joey
--
The good thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
-- Andrew S. Tanenbaum
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
