Hi, On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 05:08:24PM +0100, Francesco Potortì wrote: > I use Debian testing. It would be currently unfeasible to me trying a > more recent version until it goes to testing. So for me the choice is > among reporting against what I use or not reporting at all...
Mmh, ok, then it'kll take some time. i'll try to get 3.4.6 into sid and testing first before I upload 3.5.1 or 3.5.2 to sid > >*Any* wishlist bug against 3.4.5 does not make any sense) > > Hm. I was betting against the problem having already been corrected. > > In fact, if I am not wrong, your statement implies that "normal" users > cannot ask for new features. By using Debian testing I would place myself Nah. People using stable hava a reson for doing this. But you use testing (a development version) anyway. > among "advanced" users, yet I do not use the latest version of Libreoffice. > > >And still it would be better to file such stuff upstreasm, as them and only > >them will eventually implement it. I won't. > > I use the Debian reporting system mainly because it is far quicker for > me and I hope that the Debian maintainer pushes significant reports > upstream. That's what I am doing, but it takes time.. > Anyway, what you say holds for any package: do you mean that wishlist > bugs reported in Debian are only meaningful if they are related to > Debian packaging issues? I guess this depends on whether the maintainer has time to deal with stuff like this itself - in this case here I mainly just forward them and close them whenever upstream did it (which might never happen), so it brings little value here. I simply have no time for serious upstream work. And it of course depends on the package size and whether it's trivial to fix something or not... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
