Package: file Version: 5.10-1 Severity: normal http://etbe.coker.com.au/2012/02/11/magic-btrfs-raid/
At the above URL I posted the below magic updates, as no-one disagrees I think that they should be included. I am not sure that the Linux Software RAID entries will work OK on big-endian architectures, but I guess that including them as-is is better than the current situation. The BTRFS entry is a significant improvement on what is currently there, the UUID is pretty important and really should be included in the file(1) output. 4096 lelong 0xa92b4efc Linux Software RAID >4100 lelong x version 1.2 (%d) >4112 belong x UUID=%8x: >4116 belong x \b%8x: >4120 belong x \b%8x: >4124 belong x \b%8x >4128 string x name=%s >4168 lelong x level=%d >4188 lelong x disks=%d 0 lelong 0xa92b4efc Linux Software RAID >4 lelong x version 1.1 (%d) >16 belong x UUID=%8x: >20 belong x \b%8x: >24 belong x \b%8x: >28 belong x \b%8x >32 string x name=%s >72 lelong x level=%d >92 lelong x disks=%d # BTRFS 0×10040 string _BHRfS_M BTRFS Filesystem >0x1012b string >\0 label "%s", >0×10090 lelong x sectorsize %d, >0×10094 lelong x nodesize %d, >0×10098 lelong x leafsize %d, >0×10020 belong x UUID=%8x- >0×10024 beshort x \b%4x- >0×10026 beshort x \b%4x- >0×10028 beshort x \b%4x- >0x1002a beshort x \b%4x >0x1002c belong x \b%8x, >0×10078 lequad x %lld/ >0×10070 lequad x \b%lld bytes used, >0×10088 lequad x %lld devices -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
