On 03/14/2012 03:24 AM, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > John Johansen wrote (13 Mar 2012 16:33:53 GMT) : >> sorry I missed this, > > Thank you, John, for your answers :) > >> yes you can pull them out of the tarball, > > That would be 0002-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-interface.patch > that can be found in the kernel-patches/$LATEST/ directory of the > apparmor Debian source package. Given $LATEST == 3.1 currently, see > bellow for the Ubuntu patches that were maybe refreshed. > > John, do you confirm this patch does not depend on any of the > two others? > It does not but there may be a small conflict or two to resolve if 0001-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-network-controll.patch is not applied first.
If it doesn't apply cleanly I will be happy to update it for you. > (namely: > 0001-AppArmor-compatibility-patch-for-v5-network-controll.patch and > 0003-AppArmor-Allow-dfa-backward-compatibility-with-broke.patch) > >> or from the ubuntu kernel tree. > > I guess that would be > http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-precise.git;a=commit;h=56f928f0cbf810c047a9a72e4e5c4840800437ec > > John, please correct me if I did not guess right. > You are right >> There are also a new set of patches available against the 3.3 >> kernel. The static parts of the interface have been updated and >> pushed into the 3.4 kernel. And the goal is to get the other part >> into the 3.5 kernel (still a wip). > > John: I guess the Linux 3.2 kernel shipped in Precise will carry those > patches, and this is why the v5 compat' patches got recently reverted > in Precise's kernel tree, right? > correct >> Though those will require a more recent userspace. > > John: that will be called 2.8, right? > correct. The 2.8 userspace release will ship with precise and will be compatible with both the older and newer kernel interfaces. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org