On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16/03/2012 23:45, Fernando Lemos wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Jérémy Lal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The actual function is laughably small. 10-lines small. >> >> If that's the case, is it really a good idea to package this at all? > > You mean small packages should be avoided ? > Like libregexp-common-email-address-perl ? > > There will be at least two packages (npm and node-glob) depending > node-inherits, > so that's enough of a good reason for me.
Can't those be integrated into bigger packages? It seems useless to package with such granularity. The space overhead becomes huge, the dependency graph becomes a mess and it's not easy for a maintainer to specify tons of dependencies on tiny packages. Regards, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
