Your message dated Fri, 3 Nov 2006 17:51:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #396914,
regarding Please add hint about mdadm.conf overriding the default metadata
version
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Neil, this one (c|sh)ould be included upstream:
Patch is here:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm/mdadm/trunk/debian/patches/99-mdadm-manpage-e-default-note.dpatch?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
----- Forwarded message from Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
yesterday I created a new raid1 and after a reboot the kernel
complained about a broken superblock. I had to change the metadata
version back to 0.90 when creating the array for the kernel to accept
it. The manpage says 0.90 is the default so I first thought that was
out of date. Later I noticed that when I created the mdadm.conf a
while back a "CREATE ... metadata=1" lines got in there.
Below is a patch that adds a helpfull hint to the manpage that the
default might differ from 0.90 due to mdadm.conf.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"the thought of suicide is a great consolation: by means of it one
gets successfully through many a bad night."
- friedrich nietzsche
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
--- End Message ---
