Your message dated Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:00:15 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the Debian Bug report #451267, regarding dblatex: tries to compile incorrect document to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) "benoit.guillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---Hi, Le vendredi 16 novembre 2007 à 23:33 +0100, benoit.guillon a écrit : > I would tend to think that XML validation is out of the scope of dblatex. > At least, a systematic validation before compiling is not an option (time > consuming, option to add to disable the new feature, etc.). The idea about > validating on error is an interesting alternative but I'd like to avoid > embedding unnecessary processing in dblatex. There is no need to embed this processing when there are so many tools that can already do this job. How about the following behavior on error: * If xmllint is uninstalled, suggest it. * If it is here, try to validate the document. * If it is invalid, show the xmllint output. * If it is valid, explain that this is likely to be a bug in the style, and give the LaTeX output. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
--- End Message ---
