Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:22:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the   report #476771,
regarding Multiple latencytop instances don't play nicely with each other
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
476771: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476771
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Arjan, Sami,

I received this bug report.

I think I'll downgrade to "wishlist" (and maybe with "wontfix" flag),
but if you (arjan) have different opinion.

Sami: latencytop is a debug tool, so I think we are allowed put more
requirement to the caller (and to put less code on the debugged
program (kernel)).  So I don't think is so important to handle better
multiple instances of latencytop.

ciao
        cate


Sami Liedes wrote:
> Package: latencytop
> Version: 0.3-4
> Severity: normal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If I start two instances of latencytop and then quit one of them, the
> other latencytop no longer displays any other latencies than for
> waiting for the CPU. I believe this is caused by latencytop writing 0
> to /proc/sys/kernel/latencytop at exit, therefore disabling the
> collection of the information for the other process.
> 
> Another problem with this approach is if the latencytop process dies
> for some reason without writing 0 to that file, in which case the
> statistics collection is not disabled and (I believe) substantially
> slows down the system.
> 
> I wonder if the proper solution would be some kind of kernel interface
> where processes get latencytop information by reading from a file
> under /proc, and the feature is disabled when no processes hold the
> file open.
> 
>       Sami
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: lenny/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-rc8 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> 
> Versions of packages latencytop depends on:
> ii  libc6                     2.7-10         GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> ii  libglib2.0-0              2.16.3-2       The GLib library of C routines
> ii  libncursesw5              5.6+20080405-1 Shared libraries for terminal 
> hand
> 
> latencytop recommends no packages.
> 
> -- no debconf information



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to