Your message dated Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:44:49 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the report #515075,
regarding mdadm: Real array size does not correspond to created FS size
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [email protected]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
515075: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515075
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
also sprach Arthur Chuvashov <[email protected]> [2009.02.13.1002 +0100]:
> Tried to create RAID6 array: mdadm --create --verbose /dev/md0
> --level=6 --chunk=1024 --raid-devices=6 --spare-devices=0
> /dev/sd[abcdef]1
>
> The size of array, according to mdadm -E, is good:
>
> mdadm -E /dev/sda1
[...]
> Array Size : 3907039232 (3726.04 GiB 4000.81 GB)
[...]
> But /proc/mdstats contains invalid couln of blocks
>
> cat /proc/mdstat
> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
> md0 : active (auto-read-only) raid6 sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] sdb1[1]
> sda1[0]
> 1759555584 blocks level 6, 1024k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
That is weird. Neil, any idea?
> If I format a partition (tried XFS and reiserfs), I get 2TB
> partition instead of 4TB. This is true for mdadm 2.6.2, 2.6.7.2.
> Tried with kernel 2.6.27.17 and 2.6.28.4
I suspect XFS and reiserfs just cannot handle >2Tb filesystems? Try
ext3 or ext4?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
--- End Message ---
