Your message dated Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:54:42 +1300
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the report #564004,
regarding mdadm: option -N does not work as documented
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [email protected]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
564004: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564004
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Neil, indeed this I can confirm. One for you (see attached).
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
when everything is coming your way, you're in the wrong lane.
spamtraps: [email protected]
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.6.7.2-3
Severity: normal
the option -N as documented in the man page is not recognized by mdadm.
$ mdadm -C -Njohn
mdadm: invalid option -- N
the alternative form of the option does work however.
$ mdadm -C --name=john
mdadm: an md device must be given in this mode
--- End Message ---
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
--- End Message ---
