Your message dated Wed, 05 May 2010 00:18:17 -0700
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the report #579782,
regarding tortoisehg: Upstream release notes outdated
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [email protected]
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
579782: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579782
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
a Debian user reported [1] that the ReleaseNotes.txt file in the source
tarball mentions 1.0 as the latest release.
It actually looks like the file is intentionally updated only for major
releases. However I have to agree with Nicolás that mentioning 1.0 as
the latest release in the "last minute notes" is misleading and provide
the feeling of an outdated file.
What about keeping the file updated with the info from the wiki [2]?
Thanks,
Ludovico
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/579782
[2] http://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/stable/wiki/ReleaseNotes
--- End Message ---
