Your message dated Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:30:14 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the report #444288,
regarding [vim-runtime] syntax/tex.vim: subcitation not properly exempt from
spellchecking
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) "Charles E. Campbell, Jr." <[email protected]>
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
444288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=444288
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Charles,
As described below, \citep inside of a \citet is recognized as a
texMatcher region so spell checking is performed. Would it be possible
to recognize such nested commands such that the non-nested syntax
highlighting is used?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 10:41 AM, martin f krafft <[email protected]> wrote:
> In a construct such as
>
> \citet[cited in \citep{Rogers:2003:DoI}]{Kearns:1992:IiLGaSNA}
>
> the "DoI" is not exempt from spellchecking. If
> \citep{Rogers:2003:DoI} occurs outside of a subcitation, it is
> exempt.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
