Your message dated Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:34:00 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#290249: fixed in pocketpc-binutils 2.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 07:32:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 23:32:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CozT3-00010x-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:32:29 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 470693BC12C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:32:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kabel.telenet.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EE03BC126
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:32:28 +0100 (MET)
Received: by kabel.telenet.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id DDCF726137; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:32:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:32:27 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pocketpc-binutils: FTBFS: missing build dependency?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: pcketpc-binutils
Version: 2.15-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
checking for flex... no
checking for lex... no
checking for flex... /build/buildd/pocketpc-binutils-2.15/missing flex
checking for yywrap in -ll... no
checking lex output file root... WARNING: `flex' is missing on your system.
You should only need it if
you modified a `.l' file. You may need the `Flex' package
in order for those modifications to take effect. You can get
`Flex' from any GNU archive site.
lex.yy
[...]
checking for flex... lex
checking for yywrap in -ll... no
checking lex output file root...
/build/buildd/pocketpc-binutils-2.15/ld/config
ure: line 4505: lex: command not found
configure: error: cannot find output from lex; giving up
This seems to be a missing build dependency on flex.
Note that those are 2 different runs of configure.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290249-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2005 20:36:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 12:36:13 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CpYB3-0003wJ-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:36:13 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CpY8u-0004ig-00; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:34:00 -0500
From: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#290249: fixed in pocketpc-binutils 2.15-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:34:00 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: pocketpc-binutils
Source-Version: 2.15-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pocketpc-binutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/pocketpc-binutils/pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.diff.gz
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.dsc
to pool/main/p/pocketpc-binutils/pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.dsc
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/p/pocketpc-binutils/pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated pocketpc-binutils
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:21:53 -0800
Source: pocketpc-binutils
Binary: pocketpc-binutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.15-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
pocketpc-binutils - The GNU binutils for Pocket PC
Closes: 290249
Changes:
pocketpc-binutils (2.15-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add flex (closes: #290249) and bison to the build dependencies.
Files:
0e21bebf496358f383ac6a23d72f8ad7 617 devel optional
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.dsc
9142b21a61f11a9c65a7415c2a0b01a3 2853 devel optional
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2.diff.gz
227ec3e6a31b7e8ab38b7ffa041273aa 2251338 devel optional
pocketpc-binutils_2.15-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB6CJtvFdYF1IwUUoRAoEcAJ9kdIXOobiHgncEPlTaSc2DLnF5PgCeP0Qj
e3Yfld4wmc8Fqsa/rGjfymw=
=l6Uj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
