Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:00:51 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line these bugs are now dealt with
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2003 02:31:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 29 21:31:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-67-121-153-186.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net (triplehelix.org) 
[67.121.153.186] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19hgkF-00057f-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 21:31:15 -0500
Received: from firesong.wifi.triplehelix.org
        ([192.168.0.7] helo=firesong ident=mail)
        by triplehelix.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
        id 19hgkD-00016S-Cw; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:31:13 -0700
Received: from joshk by firesong with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 19hgkC-0007oc-00; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:31:12 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTBFS: eftest fails
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 19:31:11 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joshua Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.2 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: electric-fence
Version: 2.1.13
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

Hi,

On latest unstable and gcc, electric-fence won't build anymore. Quoth my
pbuilder log...

> cc -O2 -g -Wall tstheap.o libefence.a -o tstheap -lpthread
> libefence.a(page.o)(.text+0x1c): In function `stringErrorReport':
> /tmp/buildd/electric-fence-2.1.13/page.c:46: `sys_errlist' is deprecated; use 
> `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
> libefence.a(page.o)(.text+0x13):/tmp/buildd/electric-fence-2.1.13/page.c:45: 
> `sys_nerr' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
> cc -O2 -g -Wall   -c -o eftest.o eftest.c
> rm -f eftest
> cc -O2 -g -Wall eftest.o libefence.a -o eftest -lpthread
> libefence.a(page.o)(.text+0x1c): In function `stringErrorReport':
> /tmp/buildd/electric-fence-2.1.13/page.c:46: `sys_errlist' is deprecated; use 
> `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
> libefence.a(page.o)(.text+0x13):/tmp/buildd/electric-fence-2.1.13/page.c:45: 
> `sys_nerr' is deprecated; use `strerror' or `strerror_r' instead
>
> Testing Electric Fence.
> After the last test, it should print that the test has PASSED.
> ./eftest
> make[1]: *** [all] Segmentation fault
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/electric-fence-2.1.13'
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
> pbuilder: Failed autobuilding of package

This could be gcc as well. Any ideas?

-Josh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux firesong 2.6.0-test2-mm1 #1 Mon Jul 28 00:29:10 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set)

Versions of packages electric-fence depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203436-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2005 21:00:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 22 13:00:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CsSNM-0001tJ-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:00:57 -0800
Received: from rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.232.108]:3912)
        by ppsw-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.132]:25)
        with esmtp id 1CsSNH-0003oI-8i (Exim 4.44)
        (return-path <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>); Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:00:51 +0000
Received: from matthew by rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 1CsSNH-0007fu-00; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:00:51 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:00:51 +0000
From: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED],
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: these bugs are now dealt with
X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.2.1
Sender: Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6


I'm closing these bug reports, which were NMU-fixed, and since
included into maintainer uploads.

thanks,

Matthew

-- 
Rapun.sel - outermost outpost of the Pick Empire
http://www.pick.ucam.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to