Your message dated Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:53:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289865: libmd5-perl fails to build on arm processor
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jan 2005 13:35:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 05:35:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tomts24-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CoMBN-0004fK-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:35:37 -0800
Received: from rcserver1.ruggedcom.local ([67.69.26.42])
by tomts24-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:35:34 -0500
Received: from localhost ([10.0.0.30] RDNS failed) by rcserver1.ruggedcom.local
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:35:33 -0500
Received: from michaelgalea by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CoMBJ-0007PX-GW; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:35:33 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Galea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libmd5-perl fails to build on arm processor
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:35:33 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2005 13:35:33.0922 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6D27F020:01C4F7E2]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libmd5-perl
Version: 2.03-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: arm (armv5tel)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-5
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libmd5-perl depends on:
ii perl 5.8.4-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
Here is the offending portion of dpkg-buildpackage..
cp MD5.pm blib/lib/MD5.pm
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
"test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/md5....FAILED tests 10-11
Failed 2/14 tests, 85.71% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/md5.t 14 2 14.29% 10-11
Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 2/14 subtests failed,
85.71% okay.
make[1]: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/debian/image/rr1/test/libmd5-perl-2.03'
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289865-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2005 21:53:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 23 13:53:22 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from manifestresearch.com (server1.manifestresearch.com)
[64.39.15.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Cspfd-0002XV-00; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:53:21 -0800
Received: from [192.168.158.36] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(authenticated)
by server1.manifestresearch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
j0NMDTa31421;
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:13:29 -0600
Subject: Re: Bug#289865: libmd5-perl fails to build on arm processor
From: Jay Bonci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Nk99qe4V+7an/0oglOGf"
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:53:07 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-Nk99qe4V+7an/0oglOGf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the second opinion steve. I have no way of testing it, but it
seems somewhat unlikely to be broken.
--jay
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 06:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>=20
> > Is this bug safe to reassign / kill?
>=20
> I think you're safe to kill it, yes, unless there's evidence that
> Digest::MD5 is universally broken on arm. That seems unlikely to me, as =
I
> would expect that module to be exercised in the building of other package=
s,
> if nothing else. (I know there are a number of tests as part of the perl
> package's own testsuite.)
>=20
> Cheers,
--=20
Jay Bonci | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG: E0B8B2DE| 562B 35DC BE8D 7802 DB31 6423 64D8 790F E0B8 B2DE
--=-Nk99qe4V+7an/0oglOGf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBB9BzCZNh5D+C4st4RAgeAAJ9zeU3iXZKg/AapUW6EpjUVngOQnACfUG/S
t0uCt2uUvAURTdsT6rU1ECo=
=x2ib
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-Nk99qe4V+7an/0oglOGf--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
