Your message dated Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:47:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#293112: fixed in rfb 0.6.1-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2005 07:34:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 23:34:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.atnet.at (smtp.atnet.at) [194.152.160.15] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CvsYO-0007dg-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:34:28 -0800
Received: (qmail 5566 invoked by uid 0); 1 Feb 2005 07:34:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dog.zoo.priv.at) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@83.64.169.94)
  by mail.atnet.at with (RC4-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 1 Feb 2005 07:34:23 -0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
        by dog.zoo.priv.at with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CvsYE-0001kO-1F
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:34:18 +0100
Received: from dog.zoo.priv.at ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (dog [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
        id 05840-07 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
        Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:34:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elk.zoo.priv.at ([10.0.0.15] ident=Debian-exim)
        by dog.zoo.priv.at with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CvsY7-0001kJ-GS
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:34:11 +0100
Received: from ralf by elk.zoo.priv.at with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1CvsY2-0000Eb-A2; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:34:06 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralf Schlatterbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: on ppc x0rfbserver is linked against libxclass.so.0.6.2 but 0.8.3 is
 installed
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 08:34:06 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at zoo.priv.at
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: rfb
Version: 0.6.1-8
Severity: important

On the powerpc architecture x0rfbserver from the rfb package is linked
against libxclass.so.0.6.2 -- this version is no longer available, when
installing libxclass0, 0.8.3 is installed. Error message:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:(8)% x0rfbserver
x0rfbserver: error while loading shared libraries: libxclass.so.0.6.2:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:(9)% ldd =x0rfbserver
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x0ffcd000)
        libXtst.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXtst.so.6 (0x0ffa6000)
        libxclass.so.0.6.2 => not found
        libXpm.so.4 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXpm.so.4 (0x0ff85000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x0ff53000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x0fe5a000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x0fd81000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x0fcec000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0fcbe000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fb5f000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0fb3c000)
        /lib/ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x30000000)

The problem is specific to the ppc architecture, on x86 I'm not seeing
the problem:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:(5)% ldd =x0rfbserver
...
        libxclass.so.0.8.3 => /usr/lib/libxclass.so.0.8.3 (0x4003d000)
...


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_US.ISO-8859-15, LC_CTYPE=en_US.ISO-8859-15

Versions of packages rfb depends on:
ii  libc6                     2.3.2.ds1-18   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                   1:3.4.2-2      GCC support library
ii  libstdc++5                1:3.3.4-13     The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libx11-6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li
ii  libxclass0                0.8.3-1        C++ GUI toolkit for X
ii  libxext6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii  libxpm4                   4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X pixmap library
ii  libxtst6                  4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System event recording an
ii  xlibs                     4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m
ii  zlib1g                    1:1.2.2-3      compression library - runtime

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 293112-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 20:54:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 12:54:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CxWwQ-0003ZU-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 12:54:07 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CxWqM-0002H2-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:47:50 -0500
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#293112: fixed in rfb 0.6.1-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:47:50 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: rfb
Source-Version: 0.6.1-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rfb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rfb_0.6.1-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-10.diff.gz
rfb_0.6.1-10.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-10.dsc
rfb_0.6.1-10_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rfb/rfb_0.6.1-10_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated rfb package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat,  5 Feb 2005 21:17:31 +0100
Source: rfb
Binary: rfb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.6.1-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 rfb        - VNC Server for X11 - exports current display
Closes: 293112
Changes: 
 rfb (0.6.1-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Need xclass 0.8.3 to build correctly for sarge, closes: #293112.
Files: 
 d50207c3b614498a6991708d3d15c51a 622 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-10.dsc
 b107fbee73a93a7e55441c896c8db9c1 9300 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-10.diff.gz
 d649f8a23125c35a840f78321b639d76 243456 x11 optional rfb_0.6.1-10_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCBSqkGKGxzw/lPdkRAqB8AJ0T/KqUvYvmqXPkkXpb+8Zib1LyBACfQ1+g
fmtsXoodGMkgziWOhDRKS4k=
=Tx12
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to