Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is kind of fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 18:39:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 13 10:39:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0Oef-0003O2-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:39:37 -0800
Received: (qmail 24806 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2005 18:39:04 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 13 Feb 2005 18:39:04 -0000
Received: by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B939EBB556; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:39:02 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: widelands: can't fulfill the build dependencies in sarge
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:39:02 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: widelands
Version: build9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sarge
The following build dependencies can't be fulfilled in sarge:
- libggzcore-dev
- libggzdmod-dev
- libggz-dev
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295107-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 10:20:08 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 02:20:08 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0zoN-0003vX-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:20:07 -0800
Received: from pamunkey.imag.fr (pamunkey.imag.fr [129.88.69.8])
by imag.imag.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j1FAK4kS018582
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from navajo.imag.fr (navajo.imag.fr [129.88.69.1])
by pamunkey.imag.fr (8.11.6/8.11.3/ImagV2) with ESMTP id j1FAErf26061
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:14:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost.imag.fr ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost)
by navajo.imag.fr with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D0ztL-0004Ex-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:25:15 +0100
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1D0zoH-00056e-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:01 +0100
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:01 +0100
From: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This bug is kind of fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tctmm6wHVGT/P6vA"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4
(imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:20:04 +0100 (CET)
X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--tctmm6wHVGT/P6vA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,
Some context to massive bug fillers and people reading the RC ML.
This is about a RC against the widelands game: build-depending on ggz libs
which are not in testing.
I close this for several reasons:
- the build-deps were dropped (the relevant code in the game is not mature
enough to be enabled, the builddeps were supurious, just reminders)
- the package is not in testing any more (vorlon kicked it out)
- the package won't go back to testing until a while. People convinced me
that the game is not stable enough to stay in stable the whole lifetime
of a debian stable release.=20
Bug #295191 acts as a barrier preventing widelands to move into testing
until things get better.
=20
I prefer to have only one RC against my packages than 2. May/should I tag
#295191 sid since it's not in testing (obviously) ?
=20
=20
=20
Thanks for your time, and have a good one.
Mt.
--tctmm6wHVGT/P6vA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCEczRIiC/MeFF8zQRAnoWAJ9izo089XVgjZpMCYKPOnJ9htFTTwCfYTPB
hpaflStTCFkFxbBmUlXddeQ=
=+9kI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tctmm6wHVGT/P6vA--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
