Your message dated Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 15:23:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 07:23:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from deluge.umist.ac.uk [130.88.120.66] 
([kfm8dVLYrbiQePzPa0/T34+jYBbbSuaP])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D5mjk-0005rh-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:23:09 -0800
Received: from ratty.phy.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.128.163] 
helo=localhost.localdomain)
        by deluge.umist.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
        id 1D5mjg-00053D-U9; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:23:05 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libX11-6: missing links
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:23:23 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libX11-6
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

On my system I had to put these symbolic links
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
 lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11

Thanks, Michael

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages libX11-6 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]    1.4.30.11       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                    2.3.2.ds1-20    GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xfree86-common           4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii  xlibs-data               4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System client data

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297315-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 16:13:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 28 08:13:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bernache.ens-lyon.fr [140.77.167.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1D5nWn-0002lA-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:13:49 -0800
Received: by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix, from userid 103)
        id 7A41B7ABD4A; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bryan.is-a-geek.org (174.241.97-84.rev.gaoland.net 
[84.97.241.174])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
        (Client did not present a certificate)
        by bernache.ens-lyon.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id DCB377ABD44; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bryan.is-a-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 03B7A93315; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:13:16 +0100
From: Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#297315: libX11-6: missing links
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Operating-System: Linux 2.6.10 i686
Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=C9cole_Normale_Sup=E9rieur?=
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?e?= de Lyon
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

On 28/02/2005-17:06, michael wrote:

> Package: libX11-6
> Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10
> Severity: grave
> Tags: patch
> Justification: renders package unusable
> 
> On my system I had to put these symbolic links
>  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     11 Feb 28 14:47 libXpm.so -> libXpm.so.4
>  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     12 Feb 28 13:48 libXext.so -> libXext.so.6
>  lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     11 Feb 28 12:59 libX11.so -> libX11.so.6
> in order for `ld` to accept -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXpm -lXext -lX11
> 
Hi,

this is not a bug, the .so symlinks are provided by the -dev packages 
(libx11-dev, libxext-dev, libxpm-dev), as they are not needed at 
runtime. They are not, and should not be, included in the library 
packages themselves.
Closing this spurious bug report.

Regards,
Julien


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to