Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:53:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298173: RC bugs for sylpheed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Feb 2005 17:36:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 10 09:35:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CzIER-0001f3-00; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:35:59 -0800
Received: (qmail 18116 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 17:35:59 -0000
Received: from dsl254-022-219.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO
sirius.bignachos.com) ([216.254.22.219])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 10 Feb 2005 17:35:59 -0000
Received: from scabbers (unknown [192.168.1.10])
by sirius.bignachos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4919052FD9;
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by scabbers (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 232EC10C044; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sylpheed: Please remove aspell-dictionary relationship
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.7.1
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:41:59 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: sylpheed
Severity: normal
Please remove the Recommends: aspell-dictionary dependency. First of
all, it's redundant since libaspell15 already Recommends it. And,
second of all, I'm renaming it to aspell6-dictionary as part of the
transition to Aspell 0.60.
Thanks,
Brian
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages sylpheed depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
pn libcompfaceg1 Not found.
ii libgdk-pixbuf2 0.22.0-7 The GdkPixBuf image library, gtk+
ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines
pn libgpgme6 Not found.
ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
pn libpisock8 Not found.
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li
pn sylpheed-i18n Not found.
ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 294604-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 17:54:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 09:54:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fresno.net.uniovi.es [156.35.11.2]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DD4cl-0000y4-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:54:04 -0800
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.fresno.net.uniovi.es by fresno.net.uniovi.es
(PMDF V6.2-X27 #30969) id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,
20 Mar 2005 18:53:31 +0100 (MET)
Received: from remoto0.aic.uniovi.es (di084.edv.uniovi.es [156.35.160.84])
by fresno.net.uniovi.es (PMDF V6.2-X27 #30969)
with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun,
20 Mar 2005 18:53:31 +0100 (MET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:53:28 +0100
From: Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#298173: RC bugs for sylpheed
In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Artificial Intelligence Centre - University of Oviedo
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.6cvs1 (GTK+ 2.6.2; i386-pc-linux-gnu)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
tags 294604 - sid
thanks
Hi Justin,
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:56:47 -0500
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems that #294604 can be closed, and #298173 can be tag =
> sarge,woody,security. Correct?
Yep, seems so. Also the #294807 can be closed. Thanks for reminding ;)
> BTW: I noticed a strange version numbering in the experimental
> packages. Is this intentional?
Yes, is the same schema used by upstream.
> It seems to me that people who had installed the experimental
> versions would have to actively force the downgrade to the current
> unstable version.
Experimental packages come from CVS while unstable ones come from
releases. I don't see how a CVS version can be lower than the release
one of the same software... am I missing something?
regards,
--
Ricardo Mones Lastra - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centro de Inteligencia Artificial, Universidad de Oviedo en Gijon
33271 Asturias, SPAIN. - http://www.aic.uniovi.es/mones
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
