Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300632: fixed in tuxpaint 1:0.9.14-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2005 21:33:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 13:33:57 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DD83Z-0008CM-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:33:57 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 178442245C1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:33:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id E86942243C1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:33:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 88A6C26136; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:33:55 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:33:55 +0100
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tuxpaint: FTBFS: Changed header files.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: tuxpaint
Version: 1:0.9.14-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is no longer building problem. I get the following error:
...Compiling Tux Paint from source...
src/tuxpaint.c:176:2: #error
"---------------------------------------------------"
src/tuxpaint.c:177:2: #error "If you installed SDL_image from a package, be
sure"
src/tuxpaint.c:178:2: #error "to get the development package, as well!"
src/tuxpaint.c:179:2: #error "(e.g., 'libsdl-image1.2-devel.rpm')"
src/tuxpaint.c:180:2: #error
"---------------------------------------------------"
src/tuxpaint.c:195:2: #error
"---------------------------------------------------"
src/tuxpaint.c:196:2: #error "If you installed SDL_mixer from a package, be
sure"
src/tuxpaint.c:197:2: #error "to get the development package, as well!"
src/tuxpaint.c:198:2: #error "(e.g., 'libsdl-mixer1.2-devel.rpm')"
src/tuxpaint.c:199:2: #error
"---------------------------------------------------"
make[1]: *** [obj/tuxpaint.o] Error 1
You do seem to have both mentioned required build dependencies.
The code looks like this:
#include "SDL_image.h"
#ifndef _IMG_h
#error
#include "SDL_mixer.h"
#ifndef _MIXER_H_
#error
The first seems to be using _SDL_IMAGE_H (now?) and the
second _SDL_MIXER_H.
I find detection of presense of a header file like that a stupid
way. It should not rely on those defines.
The proper way to do this would be to have a configure script
that could then give an error message.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300632-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 00:57:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 16:57:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDBEp-00032b-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:57:47 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDB4g-0007YE-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500
From: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#300632: fixed in tuxpaint 1:0.9.14-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:18 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: tuxpaint
Source-Version: 1:0.9.14-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tuxpaint, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tuxpaint-data_0.9.14-2_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tuxpaint/tuxpaint-data_0.9.14-2_all.deb
tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tuxpaint/tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.diff.gz
tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.dsc
to pool/main/t/tuxpaint/tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.dsc
tuxpaint_0.9.14-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/t/tuxpaint/tuxpaint_0.9.14-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated tuxpaint package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:06:40 -0400
Source: tuxpaint
Binary: tuxpaint tuxpaint-data
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1:0.9.14-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
tuxpaint - A paint program for young children
tuxpaint-data - Data files for Tux Paint, a paint program for children
Closes: 300632
Changes:
tuxpaint (1:0.9.14-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Disabled broken header check, since we know we have satisified
all dependencies. (Closes: #300632)
Files:
91183fdf183ef0eac5a35ce218b0d18f 737 graphics optional tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.dsc
dffbb3f66639a862af98f0c3bad71978 5916 graphics optional
tuxpaint_0.9.14-2.diff.gz
243780b850072e3f449d02e260c58731 1093566 graphics optional
tuxpaint-data_0.9.14-2_all.deb
a812eb2752be187056df556cd51ef6d5 94056 graphics optional
tuxpaint_0.9.14-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCPhf2WpTzygsnE8gRAlQ6AJ9PMQwlRoMdK/Us7qgIPmwjwW3arACeN8gQ
qrTOd/eTyOkOfsiSFJQv8IM=
=DMYc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
