Your message dated 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299634: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2005 15:08:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 15 07:08:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rock.esc.cam.ac.uk [131.111.41.250]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBDer-0001S5-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 07:08:33 -0800
Received: from parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.44.165] ident=Debian-exim)
by rock.esc.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1DBDeF-0003g3-On
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:08:30 +0000
Received: from tow by parabrisas.esc.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DBDeF-0000dy-2P
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:07:55 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:07:55 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.2 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lapack-doc
Version: 3.0.20000531a-25
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.20000531a-25 (using
.../lapack-doc_3.0.20000
531a-27_all.deb) ...
Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove.
Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove.
Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove.
Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove.
Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/lapack-doc_3.0.20000531a-27_all.d
eb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/cgbequ.3.gz', which is also in
package
lapack3-doc
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_GB)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299634-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 15:21:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 07:21:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h-66-134-96-17.phlapafg.covad.net (intech19.enhanced.com)
[66.134.96.17]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDlCd-0001iQ-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:55 -0800
Received: from camm by intech19.enhanced.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DDlBn-0003ue-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#299634: lapack-doc: Upgrade failed due to conflict.
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 22 Mar 2005 10:21:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 50
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Greetings, and thanks for your report! This issue has been fixed to
my knowledge in current testing/unstable, which is at -27. Please
reopen if I am in error.
Take care,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: lapack-doc
> Version: 3.0.20000531a-25
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> Preparing to replace lapack-doc 3.0.20000531a-25 (using
> .../lapack-doc_3.0.20000
> 531a-27_all.deb) ...
> Document `lapack-doc.qref' is not installed, cannot remove.
> Document `lapack-doc.release' is not installed, cannot remove.
> Document `lapack-doc.faq' is not installed, cannot remove.
> Document `lapack-doc.lug' is not installed, cannot remove.
> Unpacking replacement lapack-doc ...
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/lapack-doc_3.0.20000531a-27_all.d
> eb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man3/cgbequ.3.gz', which is also in
> package
> lapack3-doc
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
> Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set
> to en_GB)
>
> -- no debconf information
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
