Your message dated Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301252: xfsprogs - not compiled on unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 17:55:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 09:55:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEWYe-0004i9-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:55:48 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9A7603C028; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:55:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:55:45 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: acl - not compiled on unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: acl
Version: 2.2.29-1
Severity: grave
This package was not built on unstable for i386:
| $ strings /usr/lib/libattr.a | grep GCC | sort -u
| GCC: (GNU) 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease)
This misscompilation leads to executable stack.
Bastian
--=20
Our missions are peaceful -- not for conquest. When we do battle, it
is only because we have no choice.
-- Kirk, "The Squire of Gothos", stardate 2124.5
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkJC/yEACgkQnw66O/MvCNGBYwCdFjEjJ+qeQExF6aQ3FwAfuY6U
Vm4AoJapjE/gYgTiLcC/QXeZTSq3rfvn
=LZow
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 301250-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2005 23:07:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 24 15:07:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DEbQN-0003Vm-00; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:35 -0800
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 65850171D21; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:07:34 -0800
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#301252: xfsprogs - not compiled on unstable
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 06:58:30PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: xfsprogs
> Version: 2.6.26-1
> Severity: grave
> This package seems to be not built on unstable, libhandle requests
> executable stack, while a unstable build does not do that.
I've uploaded recompile-only binNMUs for each of attr, acl, and xfsprogs on
i386, which is the only architecture that should be affected.
Nathan, please be sure to build your binaries against current unstable
systems (chroot or otherwise) in the future when uploading to unstable;
otherwise, we end up with binary packages that are not reproducible using
current tools.
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCQ0gzKN6ufymYLloRAiJdAKDEfnhXuasZjLD4mTBWwuv5dZdAkACdGT9C
Oz71/dRYSHGgel3ReEncy3U=
=QDy5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
