Your message dated Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:43:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303872: lilypond-data: broken dependencies
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2005 09:55:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 09 02:55:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKCgZ-00063m-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:55:27 -0700
Received: from fwd21.aul.t-online.de
by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp
id 1DKCgY-0000MP-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:55:26 +0200
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by fwd21.sul.t-online.de
with esmtp id 1DKCgM-0mlypk0; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:55:14 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andreas Rittershofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lilypond-data: broken dependencies
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:53:24 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-TOI-MSGID: f834913c-7c7d-420f-acb5-f83f507f5332
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lilypond-data
Version: 2.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Today I got with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade a new lilypond-data,
but this removed lilypond itself. So now I have an actual lilypond-data,
but no lilypond - the package is unusable.
mfg ar
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages lilypond-data depends on:
ii tetex-bin 2.0.2-28 The teTeX binary files
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 303872-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Apr 2005 17:43:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 09 10:43:37 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DKJzc-00066i-00; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:43:36 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DKJzj-0003cp-Vb; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:43:43 -0700
To: Andreas Rittershofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#303872: lilypond-data: broken dependencies
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A
92
X-Zippy-Says:
On SECOND thought, maybe I'll heat up some BAKED BEANS and watch REGIS
PHILBIN.. It's GREAT to be ALIVE!!
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:43:43 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Andreas Rittershofer's
message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:53:24 +0200")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Andreas Rittershofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lilypond-data
> Version: 2.4.5-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Today I got with apt-get update and apt-get upgrade a new lilypond-data,
> but this removed lilypond itself. So now I have an actual lilypond-data,
> but no lilypond - the package is unusable.
This is not a bug, though you did make a mistake. You have to wait
for the autobuilders to autobuild the package; telling aut-get to go
ahead and delete packages is a mistake.
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
