Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:37:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Apr 2005 07:47:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 23:47:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DHGso-0006ix-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:47:58 -0800
Received: from mnisek.casablanca.cz (orion.lan) [217.11.255.138] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DHGsn-0008Ut-00; Fri, 01 Apr 2005 01:47:57 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Petr Salinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:47:50 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
        OUR_MTA_MSGID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBLXBL,
        RCVD_IN_SBLXBL_CBL,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: dosfstools
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: critical
Tags: sarge patch
Justification: causes serious data loss

cause: dosfsck does not recognize deleted files as deleted. 
this can occur on filesystems that are NOT corrupt
if allowed to fix the filesystem (such as from the boot script) 
causes DATA LOSS

Probably the same as closed #294177.
But the problem is not amd64 specific, it is triggered by current toolchain.

i386 binary package from Sep 2003 is not affected, 
but after rebuild (i.e. by security team, by end user) will be.

Patch (already included in 2.11-1):

--- dosfsck.h~  2005-04-01 09:33:50.000000000 +0200
+++ dosfsck.h   2005-04-01 09:33:50.000000000 +0200
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
 };
 
 typedef struct {
-    __s8       name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
+    __u8       name[8],ext[3]; /* name and extension */
     __u8       attr;           /* attribute bits */
     __u8       lcase;          /* Case for base and extension */
     __u8       ctime_ms;       /* Creation time, milliseconds */


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-orion
Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2)

Versions of packages dosfstools depends on:
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302517-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2005 01:37:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 14 18:37:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DMFmB-0002QF-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:37:43 -0700
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 1601B171D59; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:37:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:37:41 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dosfstools: fsck.vfat corrupts filesystems
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Version 2.11-2 of dosfstools has reached sarge now, so I think this bug can
be closed.

Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCXxrgKN6ufymYLloRArlrAJ0XfjrIG/tudaJYNVNW3CgISF3cNwCgje8o
I00HgUZ1vaKH3+B6YHI8YJg=
=YBCU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to