On 14 May 2007 at 14:28, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
| On 14/05/07 at 06:52 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > On 14 May 2007 at 12:35, Michael Ablassmeier wrote:
| > | Package: littler
| > | Severity: serious
| > | Version: 0.0.11-1
| > | Justification: policy violation
| > |
| > | hi,
| > |
| > | Lucas has rebuild the archive on i386 and your package Failed to Build
| >
| > What shell is /bin/sh on that system?
|
| bash
Hmpf. There goes hypothesis one :-/
| >
| > The CC is very suspicous. Jeff and I do some things that depends on shell
| > and make in order to let littler find all the R libraries. For some reason,
| > that failed.
|
| ~/littler-0.0.11# cat ldflags.txt
| -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/R/lib
That's correct.
| > It all works/worked under pbuilder. How is Lucas' setup different?
|
| I am using sbuild.
|
| Could you provide a diff of your build log against mine, so we can see
| where it differs ?
Absolutely. I keep all my local pbuilder logs. The one for littler_0.0.11-1,
which used r-base-core_2.5.0-1, went fine.
Let me just try to rebuild littler now as the previous upload was against R
2.5.0-1. It so happens that some upstream changes related to builds happened
since, and I reflected work in progress in R 2.5.0-2. It just may be that
that is the cause of all this.
Yup. Just failed for me too. So it simply is r-base-core_2.5.0-2, which had
a 'local' patch. I have been using a slightly newer patch release from
upstream at work; I will package that the current one this morning and
littler *should* be fine afterwards. I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for the bug report.
Dirk
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
