On 5/9/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required > changes to configure.in to detect xulrunner-plugin and remove > MOZILLA_LIBS from the LDFLAGS. I had done exactly that before getting back to the package's current approach, except the last step. As a result, libxul-0d was pulled in as extra dependency. So, what I missed seemed to be the last step. But as you said below: > The latter would be temporary, until I > fix the xulrunner-plugin.pc file back (which has a dependency on > xulrunner-xpcom because of #413964, which was better to fix in xulrunner > than on its reverse dependencies). That means, we had better wait for that bug to be fixed before making further change..
Now that xulrunner 1.8.1.4-1 has arrived sid with the new xulrunner-plugin.pc, I propose this patch which I had done at first thought, but with irrelevant cosmetic changes removed, including the plugin directory. It's now built with libxul-dev. libxul-0d is not pulled in now. -- Theppitak Karoonboonyanan http://linux.thai.net/~thep/
swfdec-mozilla_0.4.3-2.1.debdiff
Description: Binary data
