Hi, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you sure that lmodern doesn't need a higher version of tex-common? I looked at both changelogs and couldn't see why it would. Do you have anything specific in mind? > It also seems strange that the submitter has the stable version of it, > but testing has the highest pinning priority. It seems the submitter is exercising some control over what to upgrade and what not to upgrade, which could explain why tex-common wasn't upgraded. BTW, I don't understand why both 1.0.1 and 1.7 are listed for testing at: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=tex-common&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all Any idea? -- Florent