(I'm resending this cuz I forgot to CC: everyone...)
Hi All,
IMO, this package should be dropped, as the wrapper script probably needs to be rewritten, and the package depends on stuff that is superceded by the libxml-commons-resolver1.1-java package.
IIRC, libxml-commons-resolver has hooks to provide catalog support for Saxon - though I'm not exactly sure about that.
Mark - care to adopt this (saxon-catalog) package? I seriously need to orphan it, as I no longer have the time to give it the attention it deserves.
Cheers, Mark
Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 15:19 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> And classpath is going nowhere fast, because the current version of gjdoc >> depends on kaffe, which is not built on arm. > > > > Note that the gjdoc dependency is only needed when you want to generate > the documentation as published on http://developer.classpath.org/doc/ > Debian currently doesn't do that since it isn't even building classpath > configured with --with-gjdoc. So the easiest solution is just to drop > the gjdoc build dependency since it is never used. (Of course till you > do decide to package also the generated documentation. But in that case > I would split it out into a new package classpath-gjdocs or something. > It very big.). > > Cheers, > > Mark > > P.S. GNU Classpath 0.15 was just released. > http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath/announce/20050429.html >
-- ____________________________________________________________ Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian XML/SGML: <http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org> Home Page: <http://linux.duke.edu/~mark/> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
