On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:40 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Arthur de Jong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070731 22:37]: > > Would not using: > > Conflicts: nfs-common (<< 1:1.1.0-13) > > be a nicer solution? That way, dpkg and apt would know what to do. > > Because that would remove nfs-common.
Thanks. Shouldn't that only happen on dist-upgrade (users would notice)? And since a newer nfs-common would be available wouldn't that be installed instead of removed (maybe I should try it out sometime)? Also with this mechanism wouldn't the transition to testing cause potential prolems (e.g. mount goes in before nfs-common)? (just curious) -- -- arthur - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
