Your message dated Tue, 21 Aug 2007 02:47:02 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431989: fixed in texfam 1.2.1-9.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: multex-bin
Version: 0.8.1-9
Severity: serious

While testing with piuparts, I ran into the following problem with your
package:
  Setting up multex-bin (0.8.1-9) ...
  Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf with new version
  Make format files of multex-bin. This may take some time. ...
  /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /var/lib/texmf/web2c/multex.fmt not a file.
  dpkg: error processing multex-bin (--configure):
   subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   multex-bin
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: texfam
Source-Version: 1.2.1-9.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
texfam, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9.1_all.deb
jtex-bin_1.9.1-9.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/jtex-bin_1.9.1-9.1_i386.deb
multex-bin_0.8.1-9.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/t/texfam/multex-bin_0.8.1-9.1_i386.deb
texfam_1.2.1-9.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/texfam/texfam_1.2.1-9.1.diff.gz
texfam_1.2.1-9.1.dsc
  to pool/main/t/texfam/texfam_1.2.1-9.1.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Atsuhito KOHDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated texfam package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:43:09 +0900
Source: texfam
Binary: multex-bin jlatex209-bin jtex-bin
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 1.2.1-9.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Atsuhito KOHDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 jlatex209-bin - NTT Japanese LaTeX 2.09 command and configuration files
 jtex-bin   - NTT Japanese TeX binary files
 multex-bin - Multilingual TeX binary files
Closes: 431702 431989
Changes: 
 texfam (1.2.1-9.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * NMU with the maintainer's permission.  urgency is high because this
     upload should fix RC bugs.
   * Modified postinst.in and jlatex209-bin.postinst to be compatible
     with the latest fmtutil(-sys).  (Closes: #431702, #431989)
   * Updated dependency on TeXLive (removed teTeX) to avoid possible problems.
   * Fixed typo (jmulatex->mullatex) in Description of multex-bin.
   * Deleted obsolete DH_COMPAT line from rules and created debian/compat file
     instead.
Files: 
 0e202a143623c740b4e6e15f653f2b53 639 tex optional texfam_1.2.1-9.1.dsc
 09b632df3da225417595368ea4d2912c 21475 tex optional texfam_1.2.1-9.1.diff.gz
 71d100ed1e8ac6e581fa3dc1cd8eafe1 6676 tex optional 
jlatex209-bin_1.9.1-9.1_all.deb
 5203378aaf27fdfd1cb4281136e61fec 160180 tex optional 
jtex-bin_1.9.1-9.1_i386.deb
 581b0ebe0b8ecc90a201f68df10ede34 156616 tex optional 
multex-bin_0.8.1-9.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGykwe1IXdL1v6kOwRAjNpAJ9QDnptaLecs1IkQEDRsKf3iZvkygCfbIyO
+6R8fiOlk1MqXXhjQDvpAYM=
=U5NU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to