On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 04:41:50PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > I now worked on the package as well. I looked at the changes and also > the changes in respect to the latest tarball from SF. Pushing (read: > committing[1]) things upstream is deferred though until the version in > Debian stabilized again.
Sounds good :) > My first round of changes is now done: > * Fix minor typos in German man pages. > * Update my e-mail address in debian related files > * Do not ignore errors in clean targets (thanks, lintian) > * Bump standards version to 3.7.2.2 > * Bump dephelper level to 5 These all look fine to me! > * Use linux-libc-dev now as build dependency (instead of > linux-kernel-headers) This, though, is a bug, because linux-kernel-headers and linux-libc-dev are both virtually build-essential (dependencies of libc6.1-dev). :) The correct fix is to just drop this entry from the build-deps. I've just committed this change now. > I think you should upload our changes now. Since I am no kernel developer, > I cannot really judge some of your/upstream changes, so I leave it up > to you whether you upload to experimental or unstable (depends on the > pressure from 2.6.23 as well, of course). I would prefer to get someone to proactively test it with 2.6.23 before uploading to the archive, to save on round-trips if the current patch doesn't actually fix the PT_LOAD bug. But if nothing else, I'll upload it when 2.6.23 becomes available in unstable and I've had a chance to test it myself... > I have more changes (mostly in the documentatian/build area) in the > pipeline, I will see if I've time next weekend. > Thanks for your swift help on getting aboot in shape again! N/p, thanks for keeping an eye on its status. :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
