On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:20:06PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote: > Package: po4a > Severity: serious > > Please adapt the dependencies. Thanks.
I see that perl-base has the following line: Replaces: perl (<< 5.8.8-5), perl-modules (<< 5.8.8-8), ... Should it be safe to directly depend on perl-base instead of perl-modules? Please note that I'm not sure whether unicore/PVA.pl is required for only some parts of po4a which may justify to not depend on it. But should it not at least suggest a recent version of perl-base in this case? Or is Depends: perl-base Suggests: perl-base (>> 5.8.8-8) (or something similar) invalid? PS: I now see in http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=hex-a-hop that the state of m68k is: "Dep-Wait: perl (>= 5.8.8-11)". Does this mean that the dependencies of hex-a-hop are not yet fullfilled but a build attempt happened nevertheless? Sorry for many stupid questions but I want hex-a-hop in testing as soon as possible ... Thanks, Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
