On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:20:34PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > > By the way a binNMU is an NMU (Non-maintainer upload) where no source > changes are necessary on the build daemons of the affected architectures. > It's like a rebuild on an architecture for a package which is already with > the same version in the archive on that architecture.
Ah, the point being that the libcdio maintainer should have requested binNMUs for the packages that are affected by the soname change him/herself, instead of getting the actual maintainers of the packages involved? Makes sense I guess. Still, from a user's point of view it'd be nice to see this fixed, even if it's not with the "proper" way of fixing it. Anyway, I'll try not to bug you more about this. Thanks, Vasilis -- Vasilis Vasaitis "A man is well or woe as he thinks himself so." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
