Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 07:37:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 03:33:31AM +0000, brian m. carlson <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [CC'd to debian-mips.] > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:27:20PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > > > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 08:55:53PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:46:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Please recheck with the recent gcc-snapshot 20070613 upload. We > > > > > > > may > > > > > > > miss another backport from the trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > Did someone check already ? > > > > > > > > > > Probably not; this discussion doesn't seem to be cc:ed to debian-mips? > > > > > > > > Plain upstream gcc head appears to work, gcc-snapshot fails to build > > > > with ICE. I hope to have time for it mid of next week. > > > > > > Is there any news on this? gcc-snapshot is fixed (it built on mips), > > > and gcc-4.2 is the default compiler (although it still has problems: > > > #441633). > > > > > > Could someone check and see if xulrunner now builds with gcc-4.2 or > > > gcc-snapshot and report back? > > > > FWIW, iceape failed to build with gcc-4.2 with the same exact error that > > xulrunner had, so xulrunner is likely to fail too. Note that as is, > > xulrunner can't build with gcc-4.2 due to other visibility problems. > > It seems iceape and iceweasel finally built on mips. I'll give a shot > with xulrunner.
A testbuild succeeded for me, I missed to update the bug with that information. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]