On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 05/11/07 at 18:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Package: dak
> > Version: 1.0-8.4
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: proposed-removal
> > 
> > Hi Joerg and James,
> > 
> > I have a script that finds packages which are good candidates to be
> > orphaned or removed from Debian, and dak came up.
> > 
> > I was wondering what's the status of the dak package. I don't think that
> > it's still in sync with the dak which is used in the Debian
> > infrastructure.
> > 
> > Is the dak package still useful as is?
> > 
> > Furthermore, the package has a number of unanswered RC bugs, has a low
> > popcon, and has not been in testing for nearly a year.
> > 
> > Wouldn't it be better to just remove the dak package from Debian, until
> > someone has time to package the current version?
> 
> 16:42:12 <Ganneff> anyway, an upload is planned for this year...

FYI we are in 2008...

-- 
  .''`.  Aurelien Jarno             | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
 : :' :  Debian developer           | Electrical Engineer
 `. `'   [EMAIL PROTECTED]         | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   `-    people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to