On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 05/11/07 at 18:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: dak > > Version: 1.0-8.4 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: proposed-removal > > > > Hi Joerg and James, > > > > I have a script that finds packages which are good candidates to be > > orphaned or removed from Debian, and dak came up. > > > > I was wondering what's the status of the dak package. I don't think that > > it's still in sync with the dak which is used in the Debian > > infrastructure. > > > > Is the dak package still useful as is? > > > > Furthermore, the package has a number of unanswered RC bugs, has a low > > popcon, and has not been in testing for nearly a year. > > > > Wouldn't it be better to just remove the dak package from Debian, until > > someone has time to package the current version? > > 16:42:12 <Ganneff> anyway, an upload is planned for this year...
FYI we are in 2008... -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]