Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 10:17:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309201: fixed in osgcal 0.1.28-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 14:31:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 07:31:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org [82.139.196.55] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXK9W-0007rV-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 07:31:35 -0700
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E00DB3C01F; Sun, 15 May 2005 16:31:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:31:29 +0200
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: osgcal - uses ccache but does not clean up the cache
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: osgcal
Version: 0.1.28-1
Severity: serious
osgcal uses ccache but never cleans up the cache in the clean target.
This violates policy =C2=A74.8:
| clean
| This must undo any effects that the build and binary targets may
| have had, except that it should leave alone any output files created
| in the parent directory by a run of a binary target.
Bastian
--=20
There are always alternatives.
-- Spock, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkKHXUEACgkQnw66O/MvCNGxmACfWRfuZ3o/mq7m9IGE6N46WmPv
55MAniibRcBibZL3/XFR0n8LlX1Kvlqa
=Ub8N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309201-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2005 14:22:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 22 07:22:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZrLf-0000eC-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 07:22:35 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZrGc-0004qW-00; Sun, 22 May 2005 10:17:22 -0400
From: Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#309201: fixed in osgcal 0.1.28-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 10:17:22 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: osgcal
Source-Version: 0.1.28-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
osgcal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libosgcal-dev_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/osgcal/libosgcal-dev_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
libosgcal_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/o/osgcal/libosgcal_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
osgcal-doc_0.1.28-2_all.deb
to pool/main/o/osgcal/osgcal-doc_0.1.28-2_all.deb
osgcal_0.1.28-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/o/osgcal/osgcal_0.1.28-2.diff.gz
osgcal_0.1.28-2.dsc
to pool/main/o/osgcal/osgcal_0.1.28-2.dsc
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated osgcal package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 13:18:49 +0200
Source: osgcal
Binary: libosgcal libosgcal-dev osgcal-doc
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.1.28-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Loic Dachary (OuoU) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libosgcal - cal3d to OpenSceneGraph adapter development files
libosgcal-dev - cal3d to OpenSceneGraph adapter
osgcal-doc - documentation for the cal3d to OpenSceneGraph adapter
Closes: 309201
Changes:
osgcal (0.1.28-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* do not use ccache (closes: #309201)
Files:
cbecb69a6437e5c5ef1beeb5959ddcb5 724 devel optional osgcal_0.1.28-2.dsc
7c63e6a5fb7c091845684517ecce972f 13413 devel optional osgcal_0.1.28-2.diff.gz
09bae60bb7227062aa482d4ccbd88726 10094 devel optional
libosgcal-dev_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
b0176d808b8c22f648ffc66e3b9201f9 67866 libs optional
libosgcal_0.1.28-2_i386.deb
bf19c6f24663a67149b4f2a618e748b3 22992 devel optional
osgcal-doc_0.1.28-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCkJH+8dLMyEl6F20RAsxyAJ9Ue3og6ibRpc9NukStcaG7U+9VXwCdEdeN
u/G+xBSb9CuN9+GJIqXR6cs=
=ZkcN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
