On 05/01/08 at 15:13 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 05/11/07 at 18:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Package: dak > > > Version: 1.0-8.4 > > > Severity: serious > > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Usertags: proposed-removal > > > > > > Hi Joerg and James, > > > > > > I have a script that finds packages which are good candidates to be > > > orphaned or removed from Debian, and dak came up. > > > > > > I was wondering what's the status of the dak package. I don't think that > > > it's still in sync with the dak which is used in the Debian > > > infrastructure. > > > > > > Is the dak package still useful as is? > > > > > > Furthermore, the package has a number of unanswered RC bugs, has a low > > > popcon, and has not been in testing for nearly a year. > > > > > > Wouldn't it be better to just remove the dak package from Debian, until > > > someone has time to package the current version? > > > > 16:42:12 <Ganneff> anyway, an upload is planned for this year... > > FYI we are in 2008... Hi Ganneff,
I understand that this is low priority stuff compared to your other Debian duties. Maybe it's just better to remove dak from the archive for now? The sources are available from CVS if someone wants to set it up. Having an outdated version in the archive is just misleading. What do you think? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
