hey guys, On Saturday 05 April 2008 02:02:55 am Stephen Gran wrote: > Um, > > that last umask was crack. This is actually correct.
just fyi, there's a problem in the patch for teh sqlite version. if the dump
command fails the new umask call masks $? and the error is ignored. also,
ther'es a new codepath where umask might be set but not restored. i've
imported the changes into a pending upload for unstable (so no need for
another upload there), but if you're working on something for stable you
might want to look at that. also, but less important, the new "old_umask"
variables aren't scoped with a "local" declaration (this is also fixed in
svn).
thanks
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
