Your message dated Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:29:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-patch-bootsplash has been removed from Debian, closing
#404919
has caused the Debian Bug report #404919,
regarding kernel-patch-bootsplash is obsolete and should not be shipped
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
404919: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404919
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-patch-bootsplash, kernel-patch-bootsplash
Severity: serious
Justification: file conflicts between packages
hi,
both linux-patch-bootsplash and kernel-patch-bootsplash ship
`/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/bootsplash' but do not conflict or
add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same environment:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-patch-bootsplash_2.6.18-1_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/apply/bootsplash', which is
also in package kernel-patch-bootsplash
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/linux-patch-bootsplash_2.6.18-1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
i think linux-patch-bootsplash should replace kernel-patch-bootsplash? is there
any reason for having this package twice with different versions in the
archive?
bye,
- michael
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.6.16-1+rm
The kernel-patch-bootsplash package has been removed from Debian testing,
unstable and experimental, so I am now closing the remaining open bugs.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/423245 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Raphael Geissert
--- End Message ---
